Sex Education, as the term clearly indicates, refers to education that is based on human sexual behavior. Parents, schools, or caretakers offer it in some parts of the world to educate the children who are stepping into adolescence. If formally received, sex education is either taught as a full course at high school or junior high school level or in biology, health, home economics classes. Teaching sex education is rather a controversial issue;

sex

debates have been going on for several decades, discussing if it should be taught formally in schools or not. Sex education in schools should exist without any doubts and apprehensions as it offers many benefits. Adolescence is called the “age of storm and stress.” Young teenagers, during this phase of life, are under deep psychological pressure. Mainly, this psychological pressure results from one’s growing sexual needs and the biological changes and hormonal effects on the individuals.

During this time, most of the children are observed to become easily irritable. In most situations, they find it difficult to deal with family members, and they might not want to talk to them about the natural changes taking place in their bodies and mind. In such circumstances, one highly suitable option is the teachers who can teach them to control their urges until a proper age. In schools, trained teachers would help the students to know how to deal with their sexual impulses.

Parents or other entities can not replace this role. A classroom discussion and lesson would make them feel natural, and they would also feel that someone understands them. However, taking them individually to psychologists or other trained educators would not help. In such a situation, they might consider themselves different and misunderstood by family and people around them. Therefore, it becomes crystal clear that the best way to offer sex education is always in school.

It is a psychological phenomenon that children at a young age are under immense peer pressure. Something that they learn in the class with their peer group makes a better impression on their minds than otherwise. They are more focused on the lessons that teachers offer and are more eager to ask questions to clear their ambiguities. They might feel embarrassed and uneasy questioning their parents about it, but it always differs in the case of the teacher in the class. This is because everyone in the class is going through the same stage. A class discussion becomes a healthy source of learning as it helps enhance the knowledge on the subject.

Many people advocate that sex education should only be restricted to families; parents should personally educate their children. This view is totally illogical and holds complications and questions. The first point is that not all the parents would be willing to do it or would be able to do it. Secondly, this education needs a proper channel through which it should reach its required learners. There could be many possible problems in the families, so they might not be able to take the role of a teacher in educating their children regarding sex. The demand for annulment of sex education from the schools is highly conservative.

Most importantly, there are many single parents; how would they take up this challenge of educating their children on their own? Parents can not properly educate their children about sex because they lack details that qualified sex educators convey in schools. Thus, the stance of abolishing sex education in school is not a favorable thought.

In many observed cases where parents or children are embarrassed about talking about sexual matters with each other, it is most likely to be an uneasy situation at both ends. This keeps the children from learning the answers to the questions they might have in their minds. This can be a great flaw of shifting the duty of sexual education from teachers to the parents. It will leave the children only half or less educated about the issue, and as they say, “Little knowledge is a dangerous thing,” this might end up in grave situations.

READ MORE :